The appeal concerns an order by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, New Delhi) in IB-705/ND/2021. The appellant's grievance is that their reply to the Adjudicating Authority was kept under objection and the defects were not cured. The Adjudicating Authority had also noted non-compliance with an earlier order and a delay of approximately 51 days in filing the reply. The appellant's counsel pointed out an incorrect number of days (51) mentioned in the impugned order and that the matter was listed for arguments.
Samyak Metals Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) in case IB-705/ND/2021. The appellant's grievance was that their reply was kept under objection and defects were not cured. The Adjudicating Authority had also noted non-compliance with an earlier order and a delay in filing the reply. The appellant's counsel pointed out an incorrect number of days mentioned in the impugned order. The tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to receive the reply after curing defects and to proceed with the hearing on merits. The tribunal emphasized the principles of natural justice and granted liberty to both sides to raise pleas before the Adjudicating Authority.
Sign in to view the parties.
Date of the impugned…
Earlier order of the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The appeal concerns an order by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, New Delhi) in IB-705/ND/2021. The appellant's grievance is that their reply to the Adjudicating Authority was kept under objection and the defects were not cured. The Adjudicating Authority had also noted non-compliance with an earlier order and a delay of approximately 51 days in filing the reply. The appellant's counsel pointed out an incorrect number of days (51) mentioned in the impugned order and that the matter was listed for arguments.
Samyak Metals Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) in case IB-705/ND/2021. The appellant's grievance was that their reply was kept under objection and defects were not cured. The Adjudicating Authority had also noted non-compliance with an earlier order and a delay in filing the reply. The appellant's counsel pointed out an incorrect number of days mentioned in the impugned order. The tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to receive the reply after curing defects and to proceed with the hearing on merits. The tribunal emphasized the principles of natural justice and granted liberty to both sides to raise pleas before the Adjudicating Authority.
Date of the impugned…
Earlier order of the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.