The Appellants filed a Memo of Appeal on 2022-05-30. After scrutiny, the office intimated defects to the Appellants on 2022-06-01 and returned the Memo of Appeal on 2022-06-02. The Appellants re-filed the Memo of Appeal on 2022-06-08, with a stated delay of 31 days in the Interlocutory Application (IA). The delay was attributed to resubmitting legible copies of annexures, adjusting paper sizes, changing the case title at the NCLAT portal, and affixing court stamps.
The Appellants, Sajidabanu Firoz Kaliwala Proprietor of M H Trading & Anr., filed a Memo of Appeal on 2022-05-30. The office identified defects and communicated them to the Appellants on 2022-06-01, returning the Memo of Appeal on 2022-06-02. The Appellants re-filed the Memo of Appeal on 2022-06-08, resulting in a 31-day delay. The delay was attributed to procedural issues such as resubmitting legible copies of annexures, adjusting paper sizes, changing the case title at the NCLAT portal, and affixing court stamps. The Appellants filed an Interlocutory Application (IA) seeking condonation of the delay, asserting that the delay was unintentional and bonafide.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Appellant…
The office intimated…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The Appellants filed a Memo of Appeal on 2022-05-30. After scrutiny, the office intimated defects to the Appellants on 2022-06-01 and returned the Memo of Appeal on 2022-06-02. The Appellants re-filed the Memo of Appeal on 2022-06-08, with a stated delay of 31 days in the Interlocutory Application (IA). The delay was attributed to resubmitting legible copies of annexures, adjusting paper sizes, changing the case title at the NCLAT portal, and affixing court stamps.
The Appellants, Sajidabanu Firoz Kaliwala Proprietor of M H Trading & Anr., filed a Memo of Appeal on 2022-05-30. The office identified defects and communicated them to the Appellants on 2022-06-01, returning the Memo of Appeal on 2022-06-02. The Appellants re-filed the Memo of Appeal on 2022-06-08, resulting in a 31-day delay. The delay was attributed to procedural issues such as resubmitting legible copies of annexures, adjusting paper sizes, changing the case title at the NCLAT portal, and affixing court stamps. The Appellants filed an Interlocutory Application (IA) seeking condonation of the delay, asserting that the delay was unintentional and bonafide.
The Appellant…
The office intimated…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.