The case involves an appeal filed by Sahara Export against About U Fashions Pvt. Ltd. The appellant sought condonation of a 91-day delay in refiling the appeal.
Sahara Export filed an appeal against About U Fashions Pvt. Ltd.
The appellant sought condonation of a 91-day delay in refiling the appeal.
The appellant attributed the delay to logistical constraints in removing defects raised by the Registry.
The respondent argued that the appellant failed to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay.
The Registry raised certain defects in the initial filing of the appeal, which were communicated to the appellant on 04.10.2023.
The appeal was initially e-filed on 25.09.2023 and refiled on 10.01.2024 after removing the defects.
The court considered precedents emphasizing the importance of timely resolution under the IBC.
Sign in to view the parties.
The appea…
The Registry i…
The case involves an appeal filed by Sahara Export against About U Fashions Pvt. Ltd. The appellant sought condonation of a 91-day delay in refiling the appeal.
Sahara Export filed an appeal against About U Fashions Pvt. Ltd.
The appellant sought condonation of a 91-day delay in refiling the appeal.
The appellant attributed the delay to logistical constraints in removing defects raised by the Registry.
The respondent argued that the appellant failed to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay.
The Registry raised certain defects in the initial filing of the appeal, which were communicated to the appellant on 04.10.2023.
The appeal was initially e-filed on 25.09.2023 and refiled on 10.01.2024 after removing the defects.
The court considered precedents emphasizing the importance of timely resolution under the IBC.
The appea…
The Registry i…