The appellant, claiming to be an Operational Creditor, challenged an order dated April 2, 2018, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, Mumbai. The Adjudicating Authority did not entertain the appellant's application against the decision of the Resolution Professional, who had rejected the appellant's claim. The Resolution Professional suggested placing the matter before the Committee of Creditors.
The appellant, M/s. Roma Enterprises, claimed to be an Operational Creditor. The Resolution Professional rejected the appellant's claim, leading to an appeal. The Adjudicating Authority did not entertain the application. The appellant was directed to file an additional affidavit regarding claims shown in the records of the Corporate Debtor. The respondent, Mr. Martin S.K. Golla, R.P., claimed the Corporate Debtor's records did not reflect the claim, liability, or assets. The case involved a disputed question of fact regarding whether certain goods belonged to the Corporate Debtor. The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the Resolution Professional or the Adjudicating Authority could decide this issue. The appellant did not appear for the hearing despite repeated
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
The appellant was directed to file an…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The appellant, claiming to be an Operational Creditor, challenged an order dated April 2, 2018, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, Mumbai. The Adjudicating Authority did not entertain the appellant's application against the decision of the Resolution Professional, who had rejected the appellant's claim. The Resolution Professional suggested placing the matter before the Committee of Creditors.
The appellant, M/s. Roma Enterprises, claimed to be an Operational Creditor. The Resolution Professional rejected the appellant's claim, leading to an appeal. The Adjudicating Authority did not entertain the application. The appellant was directed to file an additional affidavit regarding claims shown in the records of the Corporate Debtor. The respondent, Mr. Martin S.K. Golla, R.P., claimed the Corporate Debtor's records did not reflect the claim, liability, or assets. The case involved a disputed question of fact regarding whether certain goods belonged to the Corporate Debtor. The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the Resolution Professional or the Adjudicating Authority could decide this issue. The appellant did not appear for the hearing despite repeated
…The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
The appellant was directed to file an…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.