The case involves an appeal against an order dated April 19, 2018, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Mumbai Bench, which approved a resolution plan that had been previously approved by the Committee of Creditors. The appellant is the promoter of Raj Oil Mills Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) and also the Personal Guarantor in favor of the Financial Creditors. The appellant's grievance is against the approval of the resolution plan.
Rashidbhai Ismail Tharadra, the appellant, is the promoter of Raj Oil Mills Ltd., the corporate debtor, and also acts as a personal guarantor for the financial creditors. The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT Mumbai Bench) approved a resolution plan that was previously approved by the Committee of Creditors. The appellant filed an appeal against this approval, arguing that the personal guarantor was not heard during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The appellant was present at the meeting of the Committee of Creditors. The respondent argued that they would have realized the total amount from the Resolution Applicant. The appellant also has proceedings against them under the SARFESI Act, 2002, pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
The Appellant is the Promoter of ‘Raj Oil Mills…
The case involves an appeal against an order dated April 19, 2018, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Mumbai Bench, which approved a resolution plan that had been previously approved by the Committee of Creditors. The appellant is the promoter of Raj Oil Mills Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) and also the Personal Guarantor in favor of the Financial Creditors. The appellant's grievance is against the approval of the resolution plan.
Rashidbhai Ismail Tharadra, the appellant, is the promoter of Raj Oil Mills Ltd., the corporate debtor, and also acts as a personal guarantor for the financial creditors. The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT Mumbai Bench) approved a resolution plan that was previously approved by the Committee of Creditors. The appellant filed an appeal against this approval, arguing that the personal guarantor was not heard during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The appellant was present at the meeting of the Committee of Creditors. The respondent argued that they would have realized the total amount from the Resolution Applicant. The appellant also has proceedings against them under the SARFESI Act, 2002, pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
The Appellant is the Promoter of ‘Raj Oil Mills…