The case involves appeals against orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority. CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1992 of 2025 challenges an order dismissing I.A No. 5265 of 2025 filed by the Appellant. CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1914 & 1915 of 2025 challenges an order allowing I.A No. 5266 of 2025 filed by State Bank of India for replacement of Resolution Professional and in I.A No. 5265 of 2025 which was filed by the Appellant, suspended director notices were issued and reply was called for.
Rakeshkumar Hariram Agarwal filed appeals challenging orders related to I.A No. 5265, 5266 of 2025.
The Adjudicating Authority allowed I.A No. 5266 of 2025 filed by State Bank of India for replacement of Resolution Professional.
The Appellant is a suspended director of the Corporate Debtor.
The Appellant initiated proceedings under Section 10 of the Code.
The Appellant claims the debt of State Bank of India is barred by time.
State Bank of India contends the Appellant initiated insolvency proceedings based on its debt and a DRT decree exists.
The Adjudicating Authority rejected I.A No. 5265 of 2025 filed by the Appellant.
…Sign in to view the parties.
CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1992 of 2025 was filed…
Order by which I.A No.…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves appeals against orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority. CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1992 of 2025 challenges an order dismissing I.A No. 5265 of 2025 filed by the Appellant. CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1914 & 1915 of 2025 challenges an order allowing I.A No. 5266 of 2025 filed by State Bank of India for replacement of Resolution Professional and in I.A No. 5265 of 2025 which was filed by the Appellant, suspended director notices were issued and reply was called for.
Rakeshkumar Hariram Agarwal filed appeals challenging orders related to I.A No. 5265, 5266 of 2025.
The Adjudicating Authority allowed I.A No. 5266 of 2025 filed by State Bank of India for replacement of Resolution Professional.
The Appellant is a suspended director of the Corporate Debtor.
The Appellant initiated proceedings under Section 10 of the Code.
The Appellant claims the debt of State Bank of India is barred by time.
State Bank of India contends the Appellant initiated insolvency proceedings based on its debt and a DRT decree exists.
The Adjudicating Authority rejected I.A No. 5265 of 2025 filed by the Appellant.
…CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1992 of 2025 was filed…
Order by which I.A No.…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.