The case involves an appeal against an impugned order. The appellant claimed an amount that has been paid after reconciliation of accounts.
The impugned order was initially directed to be suspended on 04.06.2025.
An amount of Rs. 15,000/- was demanded and has been paid after reconciliation of accounts.
The respondent claims there are other dues besides those stated in the petition.
The proper course for closure of CIRP is submitted to be Section 12A of the IBC, as per para 82 of the Byju's judgment.
The impugned order and CIRP are stayed until further orders.
Sign in to view the parties.
The impugned o…
The impugned order and CIRP were stayed until…
The case involves an appeal against an impugned order. The appellant claimed an amount that has been paid after reconciliation of accounts.
The impugned order was initially directed to be suspended on 04.06.2025.
An amount of Rs. 15,000/- was demanded and has been paid after reconciliation of accounts.
The respondent claims there are other dues besides those stated in the petition.
The proper course for closure of CIRP is submitted to be Section 12A of the IBC, as per para 82 of the Byju's judgment.
The impugned order and CIRP are stayed until further orders.
The impugned o…
The impugned order and CIRP were stayed until…