This is a Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 119 of 2018 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi. The appeal concerns a resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors related to a Corporate Debtor and land belonging to Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA). The Adjudicating Authority has not yet reviewed the resolution plan to determine its compliance with Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code).
Rajendra K. Bhuta is the Resolution Professional in this case. The Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) is a party involved, owning the land in question. A resolution plan has been approved by the Committee of Creditors. This plan pertains to land belonging to MHADA, which was previously allotted to the Corporate Debtor for development. The Adjudicating Authority has not yet reviewed the resolution plan for compliance with Section 30(2) of the I&B Code. A development agreement between MHADA and the Corporate Debtor has been cancelled. The court directed the Resolution Professional to place the approved resolution plan before the Adjudicating Authority for verification and appropriate order under Section 31 of the I&B Code.
Sign in to view the parties.
Liberty granted to the ‘Resolution…
Mr. Arun Kathpalia, learned Senior Advocate…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
This is a Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 119 of 2018 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi. The appeal concerns a resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors related to a Corporate Debtor and land belonging to Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA). The Adjudicating Authority has not yet reviewed the resolution plan to determine its compliance with Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code).
Rajendra K. Bhuta is the Resolution Professional in this case. The Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) is a party involved, owning the land in question. A resolution plan has been approved by the Committee of Creditors. This plan pertains to land belonging to MHADA, which was previously allotted to the Corporate Debtor for development. The Adjudicating Authority has not yet reviewed the resolution plan for compliance with Section 30(2) of the I&B Code. A development agreement between MHADA and the Corporate Debtor has been cancelled. The court directed the Resolution Professional to place the approved resolution plan before the Adjudicating Authority for verification and appropriate order under Section 31 of the I&B Code.
Liberty granted to the ‘Resolution…
Mr. Arun Kathpalia, learned Senior Advocate…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.