The appeal was filed by Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jain, an ex-director and shareholder of Unicast Autotech Private Limited, against the order dated 08.07.2022 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi, Bench VI, in IB-763/(ND)/2021. The NCLT had admitted an application filed by Uno Minda Limited under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Unicast Autotech Private Limited. The appellant contended that there was no financial debt owed by the corporate debtor to the respondent, and the debt, if any, should be treated as an operational debt.
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jain, ex-Director/Shareholder of M/s Unicast Autotech Private Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 08.07.2022 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi, Bench VI, in IB-763/(ND)/2021. The NCLT admitted an application filed by M/s Uno Minda Limited (formerly Minda Industries Limited) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Unicast Autotech Private Limited. Unicast Autotech Private Limited is the 'Corporate Debtor'. The appellant argued that there was no financial debt against the Corporate Debtor and the money owed to the Respondent No. 1 could have been treated as operational debts. The Corporate Debtor and Respondent No. 1 had a
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Corporate Debtor and its Promoters…
A Non-Binding Offer…
The appeal was filed by Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jain, an ex-director and shareholder of Unicast Autotech Private Limited, against the order dated 08.07.2022 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi, Bench VI, in IB-763/(ND)/2021. The NCLT had admitted an application filed by Uno Minda Limited under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Unicast Autotech Private Limited. The appellant contended that there was no financial debt owed by the corporate debtor to the respondent, and the debt, if any, should be treated as an operational debt.
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jain, ex-Director/Shareholder of M/s Unicast Autotech Private Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 08.07.2022 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi, Bench VI, in IB-763/(ND)/2021. The NCLT admitted an application filed by M/s Uno Minda Limited (formerly Minda Industries Limited) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Unicast Autotech Private Limited. Unicast Autotech Private Limited is the 'Corporate Debtor'. The appellant argued that there was no financial debt against the Corporate Debtor and the money owed to the Respondent No. 1 could have been treated as operational debts. The Corporate Debtor and Respondent No. 1 had a
…The Corporate Debtor and its Promoters…
A Non-Binding Offer…