The case pertains to Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 50 of 2022 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi. The appellant, Mr. Rahuul Ramesh Shah, sought to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant stated that steps were being taken to enter into a settlement.
Mr. Rahuul Ramesh Shah filed an appeal before the NCLAT. During the proceedings, the appellant's counsel informed the court that the appellant was in the process of entering into a settlement. Consequently, the appellant requested permission to withdraw the appeal. The court granted the request, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The key fact is the appellant's decision to pursue settlement and withdraw the appeal, leading to the court's order of dismissal.
Sign in to view the parties.
The appellant's counsel requested to…
The court dismissed the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case pertains to Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 50 of 2022 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi. The appellant, Mr. Rahuul Ramesh Shah, sought to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant stated that steps were being taken to enter into a settlement.
Mr. Rahuul Ramesh Shah filed an appeal before the NCLAT. During the proceedings, the appellant's counsel informed the court that the appellant was in the process of entering into a settlement. Consequently, the appellant requested permission to withdraw the appeal. The court granted the request, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The key fact is the appellant's decision to pursue settlement and withdraw the appeal, leading to the court's order of dismissal.
The appellant's counsel requested to…
The court dismissed the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.