The appeal was filed against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority dated 17.10.2025, which admitted a Section 9 application filed by the Respondent – Operational Creditor.
The appeal is against the Adjudicating Authority's order admitting a Section 9 application.
The Appellant claims the Respondents were given work under a contract, and there was correspondence in 2019 pointing out deficiencies.
An MOU dated 20.12.2021 was signed by the Operational Creditor but not by the Corporate Debtor.
A Credit Note was given by the Operational Creditor to settle disputes.
Notice under Section 8 was issued on 19.09.2024, and a reply was given by the Appellant on 11.10.2024.
The Respondent claims the Corporate Debtor's case is based on a Credit Note dated 30.01.2023, which was not accepted by the Operational Creditor.
…Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed by the…
Hearing o…
The appeal was filed against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority dated 17.10.2025, which admitted a Section 9 application filed by the Respondent – Operational Creditor.
The appeal is against the Adjudicating Authority's order admitting a Section 9 application.
The Appellant claims the Respondents were given work under a contract, and there was correspondence in 2019 pointing out deficiencies.
An MOU dated 20.12.2021 was signed by the Operational Creditor but not by the Corporate Debtor.
A Credit Note was given by the Operational Creditor to settle disputes.
Notice under Section 8 was issued on 19.09.2024, and a reply was given by the Appellant on 11.10.2024.
The Respondent claims the Corporate Debtor's case is based on a Credit Note dated 30.01.2023, which was not accepted by the Operational Creditor.
…Order passed by the…
Hearing o…