This is an appeal filed against the order dated June 30, 2022, passed by the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority had granted the Appellant opportunities to file a Reply Affidavit, reserved the Judgement, and permitted parties to place written submissions on record within two weeks. The Appellant's counsel argued that there were valid reasons for not filing a Reply due to ongoing investigation and enquiry.
The Adjudicating Authority granted the Appellant opportunities to file a Reply Affidavit, reserved the Judgement, and permitted parties to place written submissions on record within two weeks. The Appellant's counsel argued that there were valid reasons for not filing a Reply due to ongoing investigation and enquiry. The Appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order…
The Appellate Tribunal…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
This is an appeal filed against the order dated June 30, 2022, passed by the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority had granted the Appellant opportunities to file a Reply Affidavit, reserved the Judgement, and permitted parties to place written submissions on record within two weeks. The Appellant's counsel argued that there were valid reasons for not filing a Reply due to ongoing investigation and enquiry.
The Adjudicating Authority granted the Appellant opportunities to file a Reply Affidavit, reserved the Judgement, and permitted parties to place written submissions on record within two weeks. The Appellant's counsel argued that there were valid reasons for not filing a Reply due to ongoing investigation and enquiry. The Appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority.
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order…
The Appellate Tribunal…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.