The appeal was filed against an order dated 27.07.2022, where the Adjudicating Authority rejected I.A. No. 253 of 2020, filed by the Corporate Debtor, seeking the impleadment of Ex-Directors. The appellant contended that the balance sheet does not reflect any due amount. The Adjudicating Authority observed that the contentions in the application for both sides are kept open to be argued during the hearing of the main application.
Q Top Fab Engineering Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal against an order dated 27.07.2022, where the Adjudicating Authority rejected I.A. No. 253 of 2020, filed by the Corporate Debtor, seeking the impleadment of Ex-Directors. The appellant contended that the balance sheet does not reflect any due amount. The Adjudicating Authority observed that the contentions in the application for both sides are kept open to be argued during the hearing of the main application. The court condoned a delay of 5 days in filing the appeal and disposed of I.A. No. 4135 of 2022. The court dismissed the appeal, allowing the appellant to submit all relevant documents and contentions to the Adjudicating Authority. The court also noted that the non-impleadment of Ex-Directors would not affect the
…Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed by…
Appeal filed against the order dated…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The appeal was filed against an order dated 27.07.2022, where the Adjudicating Authority rejected I.A. No. 253 of 2020, filed by the Corporate Debtor, seeking the impleadment of Ex-Directors. The appellant contended that the balance sheet does not reflect any due amount. The Adjudicating Authority observed that the contentions in the application for both sides are kept open to be argued during the hearing of the main application.
Q Top Fab Engineering Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal against an order dated 27.07.2022, where the Adjudicating Authority rejected I.A. No. 253 of 2020, filed by the Corporate Debtor, seeking the impleadment of Ex-Directors. The appellant contended that the balance sheet does not reflect any due amount. The Adjudicating Authority observed that the contentions in the application for both sides are kept open to be argued during the hearing of the main application. The court condoned a delay of 5 days in filing the appeal and disposed of I.A. No. 4135 of 2022. The court dismissed the appeal, allowing the appellant to submit all relevant documents and contentions to the Adjudicating Authority. The court also noted that the non-impleadment of Ex-Directors would not affect the
…Order passed by…
Appeal filed against the order dated…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.