Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd. filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process against Good Marketing and Sales Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Bench-III, New Delhi, rejected the application on the ground that the Appellant failed to demonstrate the existence of a 'financial debt'. The Appellant claimed that Rs.3,45,00,000/- remained as the balance amount as of March 14, 2016, apart from interest. The Corporate Debtor opposed the application, stating that the Appellant was obligated to undertake equity investment in the respondent company as per a memorandum of understanding (MoU). The Corporate Debtor also claimed an
…Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd. (Appellant) filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process against Good Marketing and Sales Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) rejected the application because the Appellant failed to demonstrate the existence of a 'financial debt'. The Appellant claimed Rs.3,45,00,000/- was outstanding as of March 14, 2016, excluding interest. The Appellant submitted evidence, including an audit report, to support the disbursal of funds and partial payments by the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor opposed the application, asserting that the Appellant was obligated to make an equity investment under a memorandum of
…Sign in to view the parties.
Date of the impugned order passed by the…
Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that…
Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd. filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process against Good Marketing and Sales Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Bench-III, New Delhi, rejected the application on the ground that the Appellant failed to demonstrate the existence of a 'financial debt'. The Appellant claimed that Rs.3,45,00,000/- remained as the balance amount as of March 14, 2016, apart from interest. The Corporate Debtor opposed the application, stating that the Appellant was obligated to undertake equity investment in the respondent company as per a memorandum of understanding (MoU). The Corporate Debtor also claimed an
…Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd. (Appellant) filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process against Good Marketing and Sales Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) rejected the application because the Appellant failed to demonstrate the existence of a 'financial debt'. The Appellant claimed Rs.3,45,00,000/- was outstanding as of March 14, 2016, excluding interest. The Appellant submitted evidence, including an audit report, to support the disbursal of funds and partial payments by the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor opposed the application, asserting that the Appellant was obligated to make an equity investment under a memorandum of
…Date of the impugned order passed by the…
Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that…