The case involves a Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 360 of 2021 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. The appellant, Pradeep Jain, filed an appeal against State Bank of India & Anr. regarding a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). The financial creditors have accepted the proposal of the Corporate Debtor Company. The appellant sought the revival of the appeal, contingent on the implementation of a settlement agreement.
Pradeep Jain filed an appeal against State Bank of India & Anr. The appeal pertains to a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). All six financial creditors have accepted the Corporate Debtor Company's settlement proposal. The appellant sought the revival of the appeal contingent on the implementation of a settlement agreement. The Board of Directors of the Corporate Debtor Company is currently suspended, preventing them from convening a meeting to authorize the settlement. The court considered submissions from both the appellant's and respondent's counsels. The guarantors were expected to file a guarantee to ensure the settlement's implementation. The IRP was to hand over charge to the Directors of the Corporate Debtor Company and ensure payment of CIRP
…Sign in to view the parties.
Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submits that all…
Parties are directed to…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 360 of 2021 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. The appellant, Pradeep Jain, filed an appeal against State Bank of India & Anr. regarding a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). The financial creditors have accepted the proposal of the Corporate Debtor Company. The appellant sought the revival of the appeal, contingent on the implementation of a settlement agreement.
Pradeep Jain filed an appeal against State Bank of India & Anr. The appeal pertains to a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). All six financial creditors have accepted the Corporate Debtor Company's settlement proposal. The appellant sought the revival of the appeal contingent on the implementation of a settlement agreement. The Board of Directors of the Corporate Debtor Company is currently suspended, preventing them from convening a meeting to authorize the settlement. The court considered submissions from both the appellant's and respondent's counsels. The guarantors were expected to file a guarantee to ensure the settlement's implementation. The IRP was to hand over charge to the Directors of the Corporate Debtor Company and ensure payment of CIRP
…Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submits that all…
Parties are directed to…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.