The Income Tax Department filed an appeal against an order, claiming they were not a party before the Adjudicating Authority. They learned of the impugned order dated 19th April 2018, when a free certified copy was provided on 17th September 2018, and the appeal was filed on 22nd October 2018. The appellant's counsel argued that the delay of 6 days was due to the Appellate Tribunal being closed for Pooja Vacation. The Respondent's counsel stated they had informed the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Ward CC 6(1) on 11th June 2018. The Adjudicating Authority served a copy of the impugned order on the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3, Mumbai, who then preferred the appeal.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3, Mumbai, filed an appeal against Raj Oil Mills Ltd. & Ors. The Income Tax Department claimed they were not initially a party before the Adjudicating Authority regarding an order dated 19th April 2018. They received a certified copy of the order on 17th September 2018 and filed the appeal on 22nd October 2018. The appellant cited a 6-day delay due to the Appellate Tribunal's closure for Pooja Vacation. The respondents claim to have intimated the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax on 11th June 2018. The Adjudicating Authority served the impugned order on the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, leading to the appeal. The key issue is whether income tax is an operational debt under the I&B Code and whether the resolution
…Sign in to view the parties.
Date of the original…
Respondents intimated…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal against an order, claiming they were not a party before the Adjudicating Authority. They learned of the impugned order dated 19th April 2018, when a free certified copy was provided on 17th September 2018, and the appeal was filed on 22nd October 2018. The appellant's counsel argued that the delay of 6 days was due to the Appellate Tribunal being closed for Pooja Vacation. The Respondent's counsel stated they had informed the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Ward CC 6(1) on 11th June 2018. The Adjudicating Authority served a copy of the impugned order on the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3, Mumbai, who then preferred the appeal.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3, Mumbai, filed an appeal against Raj Oil Mills Ltd. & Ors. The Income Tax Department claimed they were not initially a party before the Adjudicating Authority regarding an order dated 19th April 2018. They received a certified copy of the order on 17th September 2018 and filed the appeal on 22nd October 2018. The appellant cited a 6-day delay due to the Appellate Tribunal's closure for Pooja Vacation. The respondents claim to have intimated the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax on 11th June 2018. The Adjudicating Authority served the impugned order on the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, leading to the appeal. The key issue is whether income tax is an operational debt under the I&B Code and whether the resolution
…Date of the original…
Respondents intimated…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.