The case is an appeal under Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 701 of 2023. The appellant is Pawan Kumar Manguturam Bairagra, and the respondent is Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. The learned counsel for both the appellant and the respondent are present.
The case involves an appeal where Pawan Kumar Manguturam Bairagra is the appellant and Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. is the respondent. Both parties are represented by their respective counsels. The respondent has stated their willingness to accept the principal amount of Rs. 24.10 Crores to settle the matter, with a condition that they will not proceed against the Personal Guarantor. The court has directed the appellant's counsel to seek instructions from the appellant regarding this settlement offer. The relevance of the facts lies in the potential resolution of the appeal through a settlement agreement.
Sign in to view the parties.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that…
The matter is listed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case is an appeal under Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 701 of 2023. The appellant is Pawan Kumar Manguturam Bairagra, and the respondent is Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. The learned counsel for both the appellant and the respondent are present.
The case involves an appeal where Pawan Kumar Manguturam Bairagra is the appellant and Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. is the respondent. Both parties are represented by their respective counsels. The respondent has stated their willingness to accept the principal amount of Rs. 24.10 Crores to settle the matter, with a condition that they will not proceed against the Personal Guarantor. The court has directed the appellant's counsel to seek instructions from the appellant regarding this settlement offer. The relevance of the facts lies in the potential resolution of the appeal through a settlement agreement.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that…
The matter is listed…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.