The case involves an appeal against an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority/National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad, which rejected an application filed under Section 60(5) and 235A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Corporate Debtor, GPT Steel Ltd, was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) on May 2, 2019. The Appellant and Respondent No. 3 were both Resolution Applicants in the CIRP. The Appellant alleges that Respondent No. 3's Resolution Plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors (COC) without considering the final revised Resolution Plan submitted by the Appellant. The Appellant also raised concerns about Respondent No. 3's performance in other Resolution Plans and alleged suppression of material
…The Corporate Debtor, GPT Steel Ltd, was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) on May 2, 2019. Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt Ltd (the Appellant) and GP Global Energy Pvt Ltd (Respondent No. 3) were both Resolution Applicants. The Appellant submitted a Resolution Plan and EMD of rupees one crore on October 1, 2019. The Appellant filed IA No. 116 of 2020 before the Adjudicating Authority on February 2, 2020, alleging disqualification and lack of credibility of Respondent No. 3, claiming that Respondent No. 3 had defaulted in implementing other Resolution Plans, specifically Allied Strips. The Appellant contended that the CIRP expired on February 18, 2020. The COC approved the Resolution Plan of Respondent No. 3 with a voting share of 82.41%. The
…Sign in to view the parties.
GPT Steel Ltd admitted…
Appellant submitted…
The case involves an appeal against an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority/National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad, which rejected an application filed under Section 60(5) and 235A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Corporate Debtor, GPT Steel Ltd, was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) on May 2, 2019. The Appellant and Respondent No. 3 were both Resolution Applicants in the CIRP. The Appellant alleges that Respondent No. 3's Resolution Plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors (COC) without considering the final revised Resolution Plan submitted by the Appellant. The Appellant also raised concerns about Respondent No. 3's performance in other Resolution Plans and alleged suppression of material
…The Corporate Debtor, GPT Steel Ltd, was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) on May 2, 2019. Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt Ltd (the Appellant) and GP Global Energy Pvt Ltd (Respondent No. 3) were both Resolution Applicants. The Appellant submitted a Resolution Plan and EMD of rupees one crore on October 1, 2019. The Appellant filed IA No. 116 of 2020 before the Adjudicating Authority on February 2, 2020, alleging disqualification and lack of credibility of Respondent No. 3, claiming that Respondent No. 3 had defaulted in implementing other Resolution Plans, specifically Allied Strips. The Appellant contended that the CIRP expired on February 18, 2020. The COC approved the Resolution Plan of Respondent No. 3 with a voting share of 82.41%. The
…GPT Steel Ltd admitted…
Appellant submitted…