The case involves an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal because a decision on an application under Section 12A of the I&B Code was pending before the Adjudicating Authority.
The appellant, Niraj Kumar & Ors., filed an appeal before the NCLAT. Anil Matta, the Resolution Professional of Primrose Infratech Pvt. Ltd & Ors., is the respondent. The appellant's counsel offered to withdraw the appeal because a decision on an application under Section 12A of the I&B Code was pending before the Adjudicating Authority. The court dismissed the appeal without prejudice to the appellant's right to challenge the decision on the pending application if aggrieved. The key fact is the appellant's voluntary withdrawal of the appeal due to the pending decision on the Section 12A application, which influenced the court's decision to dismiss the appeal without prejudice.
Sign in to view the parties.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal after the…
The case involves an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal because a decision on an application under Section 12A of the I&B Code was pending before the Adjudicating Authority.
The appellant, Niraj Kumar & Ors., filed an appeal before the NCLAT. Anil Matta, the Resolution Professional of Primrose Infratech Pvt. Ltd & Ors., is the respondent. The appellant's counsel offered to withdraw the appeal because a decision on an application under Section 12A of the I&B Code was pending before the Adjudicating Authority. The court dismissed the appeal without prejudice to the appellant's right to challenge the decision on the pending application if aggrieved. The key fact is the appellant's voluntary withdrawal of the appeal due to the pending decision on the Section 12A application, which influenced the court's decision to dismiss the appeal without prejudice.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal after the…