This is an appeal case before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning typographical errors in a judgment dated July 21, 2017. The appellant's counsel pointed out these errors, which include incorrect naming of parties and a project name within the judgment.
The case involves an appeal regarding typographical errors in a judgment dated July 21, 2017. The errors include the incorrect naming of the parties in the cause title as "Nikhil Mehta & Sons v. AMR Infrastructures Limited" instead of "Nikhil Mehta & Sons (HUF) & Ors. V. AMR Infrastructures Limited". Another error involves the incorrect naming of a project as "Kessel-I Valley, one Mall and One Home" instead of "Kessel-I Valley, I Mall and I Homes". Additionally, there was an error in para 21 regarding the description of amounts deposited by investors. These errors were brought to the court's attention by the appellant's counsel.
Sign in to view the parties.
The date of the…
Appellant's counsel…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
This is an appeal case before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning typographical errors in a judgment dated July 21, 2017. The appellant's counsel pointed out these errors, which include incorrect naming of parties and a project name within the judgment.
The case involves an appeal regarding typographical errors in a judgment dated July 21, 2017. The errors include the incorrect naming of the parties in the cause title as "Nikhil Mehta & Sons v. AMR Infrastructures Limited" instead of "Nikhil Mehta & Sons (HUF) & Ors. V. AMR Infrastructures Limited". Another error involves the incorrect naming of a project as "Kessel-I Valley, one Mall and One Home" instead of "Kessel-I Valley, I Mall and I Homes". Additionally, there was an error in para 21 regarding the description of amounts deposited by investors. These errors were brought to the court's attention by the appellant's counsel.
The date of the…
Appellant's counsel…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.