The case involves an appeal against an order, with a delay of 16 days in filing. The appellant claims they were not party to the proceedings and only became aware of the order via email on 03.11.2025.
The appeal was filed with a delay of 16 days.
The order being appealed was passed on 16.10.2025.
The appeal was e-filed on 01.12.2025.
The appellant claims they were not party to the proceedings and only filed a claim as a worker.
The appellant became aware of the order via email dated 03.11.2025.
The respondent argued that the appeal was filed on the 46th day, beyond the condonable period.
The court's jurisdiction to condone delay is limited to 15 days as per Section 61(2) proviso.
Sign in to view the parties.
The order…
The appellant claims…
The case involves an appeal against an order, with a delay of 16 days in filing. The appellant claims they were not party to the proceedings and only became aware of the order via email on 03.11.2025.
The appeal was filed with a delay of 16 days.
The order being appealed was passed on 16.10.2025.
The appeal was e-filed on 01.12.2025.
The appellant claims they were not party to the proceedings and only filed a claim as a worker.
The appellant became aware of the order via email dated 03.11.2025.
The respondent argued that the appeal was filed on the 46th day, beyond the condonable period.
The court's jurisdiction to condone delay is limited to 15 days as per Section 61(2) proviso.
The order…
The appellant claims…