The case involves an appeal filed by Munagala Roja Harsha Vardhini against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Amaravathi Bench, in CP (IB) No.45/7/AMR/2020. The appeal, Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.23/2024, includes an application (IA No.83/2024) to condone a delay in filing the appeal. The appellant claims a delay of 12 days (or 26 days according to the Registry), while the respondent argues the delay is actually 26 days, exceeding the permissible condonation period under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The appellant cites illness and the time required to obtain a certified copy of the impugned order as reasons for the delay.
Munagala Roja Harsha Vardhini filed an appeal against an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Amaravathi Bench. The appeal was delayed, prompting an application to condone the delay (IA No.83/2024). The NCLT order was dated 24.11.2022. The appellant claims the delay was due to illness ('Enteric Fever' and 'Hepatitis Urinary Tract Infection') between 18.11.2022 and 06.01.2023, preventing her from examining the papers and approving the 'Memorandum of Appeal'. The appellant received a 'free cost' 'certified copy of the Order' on 07.12.2022. The appeal was filed on 19.01.2023. The appellant is a resident of Tenali, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. The respondent, Vardhansmart Private Limited, argues the delay exceeds the condonable period under Section 61(2) of the
…Sign in to view the parties.
Date of the Impugned Order passed by the…
Start date of the appellant's illness…
The case involves an appeal filed by Munagala Roja Harsha Vardhini against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Amaravathi Bench, in CP (IB) No.45/7/AMR/2020. The appeal, Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.23/2024, includes an application (IA No.83/2024) to condone a delay in filing the appeal. The appellant claims a delay of 12 days (or 26 days according to the Registry), while the respondent argues the delay is actually 26 days, exceeding the permissible condonation period under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The appellant cites illness and the time required to obtain a certified copy of the impugned order as reasons for the delay.
Munagala Roja Harsha Vardhini filed an appeal against an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Amaravathi Bench. The appeal was delayed, prompting an application to condone the delay (IA No.83/2024). The NCLT order was dated 24.11.2022. The appellant claims the delay was due to illness ('Enteric Fever' and 'Hepatitis Urinary Tract Infection') between 18.11.2022 and 06.01.2023, preventing her from examining the papers and approving the 'Memorandum of Appeal'. The appellant received a 'free cost' 'certified copy of the Order' on 07.12.2022. The appeal was filed on 19.01.2023. The appellant is a resident of Tenali, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. The respondent, Vardhansmart Private Limited, argues the delay exceeds the condonable period under Section 61(2) of the
…Date of the Impugned Order passed by the…
Start date of the appellant's illness…