This is an appeal against the order dated 30.03.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad, Court-2, which admitted an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The parties have now settled the matter, and the settlement terms have been incorporated in Application I.A No. 1653 of 2022.
Ms. Lopa Pankaj Dave, the Suspended Director of Raymon Patel Gelatine Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against Mrs. Sunandaben R. Patel & Anr. The appeal contested an order dated 30.03.2022 by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT), Ahmedabad, which admitted an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. During the proceedings, the parties reached a settlement, and the terms were incorporated in an application. The appellant's counsel stated that a demand draft of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- had already been handed over to the respondent, with another draft of Rs. 80,00,000/- to follow within seven days. The respondent's counsel noted that the post-dated cheques received were in the wrong name of Respondent No.1, which the appellant agreed to rectify. The
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
Learned Counsel…
This is an appeal against the order dated 30.03.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad, Court-2, which admitted an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The parties have now settled the matter, and the settlement terms have been incorporated in Application I.A No. 1653 of 2022.
Ms. Lopa Pankaj Dave, the Suspended Director of Raymon Patel Gelatine Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against Mrs. Sunandaben R. Patel & Anr. The appeal contested an order dated 30.03.2022 by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT), Ahmedabad, which admitted an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. During the proceedings, the parties reached a settlement, and the terms were incorporated in an application. The appellant's counsel stated that a demand draft of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- had already been handed over to the respondent, with another draft of Rs. 80,00,000/- to follow within seven days. The respondent's counsel noted that the post-dated cheques received were in the wrong name of Respondent No.1, which the appellant agreed to rectify. The
…The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
Learned Counsel…