The case involves an appeal against the order dated 16th November 2021 passed by the Adjudicating Authority / National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-I, Hyderabad in CP (IB) No. 525/9/HDB/2019, which admitted an application filed by Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent No.1) against Abhirama Steels Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). The Appellant, Mr. Palaparty Abhishek, representing Abhirama Steels Ltd., argued that the Adjudicating Authority's order was erroneous. The dispute arose from an alleged default on an oral purchase order for mild steel billets, with the Appellant claiming the goods supplied were of inferior quality and the claims were time-barred. The Respondent contended that the debt arose from a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 13.02.2016, and the
…Mr. Palaparty Abhishek, representing Abhirama Steels Ltd., appealed against an order admitting an insolvency application filed by Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. The dispute originated from an alleged oral purchase order for mild steel billets. Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. claimed Abhirama Steels Ltd. defaulted on payments for invoices raised between 2015 and 2016, totaling Rs.1,77,15,636/-. Abhirama Steels Ltd. contended the supplied goods were of inferior quality and informed Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. to rectify the issue. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was drafted on 13.02.2016, where Abhirama Steels Ltd. agreed to repay the amount by 29.02.2016. Abhirama Steels Ltd. issued cheques that were later dishonored. Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. initiated proceedings under
…Sign in to view the parties.
MoU was drafted where…
Cheques issued by…
The case involves an appeal against the order dated 16th November 2021 passed by the Adjudicating Authority / National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-I, Hyderabad in CP (IB) No. 525/9/HDB/2019, which admitted an application filed by Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent No.1) against Abhirama Steels Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). The Appellant, Mr. Palaparty Abhishek, representing Abhirama Steels Ltd., argued that the Adjudicating Authority's order was erroneous. The dispute arose from an alleged default on an oral purchase order for mild steel billets, with the Appellant claiming the goods supplied were of inferior quality and the claims were time-barred. The Respondent contended that the debt arose from a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 13.02.2016, and the
…Mr. Palaparty Abhishek, representing Abhirama Steels Ltd., appealed against an order admitting an insolvency application filed by Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. The dispute originated from an alleged oral purchase order for mild steel billets. Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. claimed Abhirama Steels Ltd. defaulted on payments for invoices raised between 2015 and 2016, totaling Rs.1,77,15,636/-. Abhirama Steels Ltd. contended the supplied goods were of inferior quality and informed Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. to rectify the issue. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was drafted on 13.02.2016, where Abhirama Steels Ltd. agreed to repay the amount by 29.02.2016. Abhirama Steels Ltd. issued cheques that were later dishonored. Binjusaria Ispat Pvt. Ltd. initiated proceedings under
…MoU was drafted where…
Cheques issued by…