The case involves an appeal against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai Bench, in a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The appellant, a suspended director of Cema Electric Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd (the Corporate Debtor), challenged the NCLT's order, arguing that the NCLT failed to consider objections raised regarding the operational creditor's claim. The appellant contended that the NCLT did not properly account for defective goods returned by distributors and the corresponding credit adjustments that should have been made to the operational creditor's claim. The respondent, Overdrive Electronics (P) Ltd., initiated the CIRP. The appellant argued that the
…Mr. KN Devdass, the suspended director of Cema Electric Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd, filed an appeal against an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai Bench. The appeal, numbered Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.299/2024, arises from CP/IB/173(CHE)/2023. Overdrive Electronics (P) Ltd. initiated CIRP against Cema Electric. Devdass argued that the NCLT failed to consider objections regarding the operational creditor's claim, specifically concerning defective goods returned by distributors and the corresponding credit adjustments. He submitted that the operational creditor, Overdrive Electronics, had not extended cooperation in inspecting the defective liquidation estate. The appellant also raised objections on 14.03.2024, detailing the amount in
…Sign in to view the parties.
Proceedings initiated before the Adjudicating…
Order passed by the Hon'ble Tribunal regarding…
The case involves an appeal against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai Bench, in a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The appellant, a suspended director of Cema Electric Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd (the Corporate Debtor), challenged the NCLT's order, arguing that the NCLT failed to consider objections raised regarding the operational creditor's claim. The appellant contended that the NCLT did not properly account for defective goods returned by distributors and the corresponding credit adjustments that should have been made to the operational creditor's claim. The respondent, Overdrive Electronics (P) Ltd., initiated the CIRP. The appellant argued that the
…Mr. KN Devdass, the suspended director of Cema Electric Lighting Products India Pvt Ltd, filed an appeal against an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai Bench. The appeal, numbered Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.299/2024, arises from CP/IB/173(CHE)/2023. Overdrive Electronics (P) Ltd. initiated CIRP against Cema Electric. Devdass argued that the NCLT failed to consider objections regarding the operational creditor's claim, specifically concerning defective goods returned by distributors and the corresponding credit adjustments. He submitted that the operational creditor, Overdrive Electronics, had not extended cooperation in inspecting the defective liquidation estate. The appellant also raised objections on 14.03.2024, detailing the amount in
…Proceedings initiated before the Adjudicating…
Order passed by the Hon'ble Tribunal regarding…