The case involves an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning a dispute over input tax credit. The appellant, Mr. Ajay Rana, Director of Sarika Industries Pvt. Ltd., is contesting proceedings initiated against them, arguing that they are required to reverse the entire input tax credit due to actions by the GST Department. The appellant was directed to implead the GST Department as Respondent No. 3.
Mr. Ajay Rana, Director of Sarika Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against Sanjay Kumar Goel & Anr. The appellant claimed that the principal amount for which the application was filed was Rs. 79,82,857/-, which they had not disputed in reply to a demand notice. However, the GST Department allegedly instructed the appellant not to make the payment to the Operational Creditor. Consequently, proceedings were initiated against the appellant, requiring them to reverse the entire input tax credit. The respondent relied on an order from the Delhi High Court in W.P.(C) 6208/2019. The NCLAT directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 79,82,857/- as a fixed deposit with the Registrar, NCLAT.
Sign in to view the parties.
Date of the order that…
The court permitted the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning a dispute over input tax credit. The appellant, Mr. Ajay Rana, Director of Sarika Industries Pvt. Ltd., is contesting proceedings initiated against them, arguing that they are required to reverse the entire input tax credit due to actions by the GST Department. The appellant was directed to implead the GST Department as Respondent No. 3.
Mr. Ajay Rana, Director of Sarika Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against Sanjay Kumar Goel & Anr. The appellant claimed that the principal amount for which the application was filed was Rs. 79,82,857/-, which they had not disputed in reply to a demand notice. However, the GST Department allegedly instructed the appellant not to make the payment to the Operational Creditor. Consequently, proceedings were initiated against the appellant, requiring them to reverse the entire input tax credit. The respondent relied on an order from the Delhi High Court in W.P.(C) 6208/2019. The NCLAT directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 79,82,857/- as a fixed deposit with the Registrar, NCLAT.
Date of the order that…
The court permitted the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.