The case involves an appeal against an Impugned Order. An error was noted in the minutes of proceedings from January 23, 2020, where it was inadvertently observed that the Liquidator would proceed according to a previous decision. This was factually incorrect as no liquidation order had been passed on the application filed under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellant had filed an application for rectification of errors in the Impugned Order, but simultaneously pursued an appeal against the same order.
An error was recorded in the minutes of proceedings on January 23, 2020, stating that the Liquidator would proceed based on a previous decision. However, no liquidation order had been passed under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellant filed an application for rectification of errors in the Impugned Order while simultaneously appealing against it. The Appellant then sought to withdraw the appeal with the liberty to re-agitate the matter if the rectification prayer is not entertained by the Adjudicating Authority. This contradictory approach created an unusual situation for the court.
Sign in to view the parties.
Minutes of proceedings…
Reference to Company…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against an Impugned Order. An error was noted in the minutes of proceedings from January 23, 2020, where it was inadvertently observed that the Liquidator would proceed according to a previous decision. This was factually incorrect as no liquidation order had been passed on the application filed under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellant had filed an application for rectification of errors in the Impugned Order, but simultaneously pursued an appeal against the same order.
An error was recorded in the minutes of proceedings on January 23, 2020, stating that the Liquidator would proceed based on a previous decision. However, no liquidation order had been passed under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellant filed an application for rectification of errors in the Impugned Order while simultaneously appealing against it. The Appellant then sought to withdraw the appeal with the liberty to re-agitate the matter if the rectification prayer is not entertained by the Adjudicating Authority. This contradictory approach created an unusual situation for the court.
Minutes of proceedings…
Reference to Company…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.