M/s MCL Global Steel Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (Corporate Debtor) filed an appeal against the order dated 6th March 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, which admitted the application preferred by Respondents M/s Essar Projects India Limited and Anr. (Operational Creditor) under section 8 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The appellant argued that the Adjudicating Authority passed an ex parte order without prior notice or intimation of hearing, violating the principles of natural justice. They also contended that the Operational Creditor concealed the existence of a dispute between the parties and that the Adjudicating Authority failed to notice
…M/s MCL Global Steel Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with M/s Essar Projects India Limited (Operational Creditor) for construction work. Disputes arose regarding the quality of construction and timely completion of the work. The Operational Creditor issued a notice dated 26th October 2016 under Section 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act 1956, claiming outstanding dues of Rs. 6,83,06,077. The Corporate Debtor replied on 21st November 2016, disputing the claim and raising concerns about the quality of construction, timelines, and reconciliation of accounts. The Operational Creditor then filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The
…Sign in to view the parties.
Corporate Debtor raised concerns regarding…
Corporate Debtor raised concerns regarding…
M/s MCL Global Steel Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (Corporate Debtor) filed an appeal against the order dated 6th March 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, which admitted the application preferred by Respondents M/s Essar Projects India Limited and Anr. (Operational Creditor) under section 8 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The appellant argued that the Adjudicating Authority passed an ex parte order without prior notice or intimation of hearing, violating the principles of natural justice. They also contended that the Operational Creditor concealed the existence of a dispute between the parties and that the Adjudicating Authority failed to notice
…M/s MCL Global Steel Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with M/s Essar Projects India Limited (Operational Creditor) for construction work. Disputes arose regarding the quality of construction and timely completion of the work. The Operational Creditor issued a notice dated 26th October 2016 under Section 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act 1956, claiming outstanding dues of Rs. 6,83,06,077. The Corporate Debtor replied on 21st November 2016, disputing the claim and raising concerns about the quality of construction, timelines, and reconciliation of accounts. The Operational Creditor then filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The
…Corporate Debtor raised concerns regarding…
Corporate Debtor raised concerns regarding…