The appellant, Director of IERO Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor), filed an appeal against the order dated November 13, 2017, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, in C.P. No. IB-355/ND/2017. The application preferred by Ajay Kumar Gupta and Mrs. Poonam Gupta under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was admitted, a moratorium was ordered, and an Interim Resolution Professional was appointed.
The Director of IERO Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) appealed against an order by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) which admitted an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by Ajay Kumar Gupta and Mrs. Poonam Gupta. The Adjudicating Authority also ordered a moratorium and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional. A settlement was purportedly reached between the Corporate Debtor and the Financial Creditor. However, the Appellate Tribunal stated it was not empowered to accept the settlement. The key fact is the settlement reached between the parties after the admission of the application under Section 7, and the inability of the NCLAT to accept such settlement.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
A settlement was…
The appellant, Director of IERO Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor), filed an appeal against the order dated November 13, 2017, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, in C.P. No. IB-355/ND/2017. The application preferred by Ajay Kumar Gupta and Mrs. Poonam Gupta under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was admitted, a moratorium was ordered, and an Interim Resolution Professional was appointed.
The Director of IERO Fiveriver Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) appealed against an order by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) which admitted an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by Ajay Kumar Gupta and Mrs. Poonam Gupta. The Adjudicating Authority also ordered a moratorium and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional. A settlement was purportedly reached between the Corporate Debtor and the Financial Creditor. However, the Appellate Tribunal stated it was not empowered to accept the settlement. The key fact is the settlement reached between the parties after the admission of the application under Section 7, and the inability of the NCLAT to accept such settlement.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
A settlement was…