Living Consumer Products Private Limited (LCPPL), the Appellant, filed an appeal against the order dated 14th October 2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, which rejected its application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The application was filed against Play Games 24x7 Private Limited, the Respondent and Corporate Debtor, and was rejected on the ground of a pre-existing dispute. The Appellant claimed to have supplied digital marketing and advertising services to the Corporate Debtor as per a contract dated 09.07.2018, with operational dues in default amounting to Rs.6,35,13,977/-. The Corporate Debtor argued that a legal notice dated 23rd March 2019, sent before the demand notice,
…Living Consumer Products Private Limited (LCPPL) and Play Games 24x7 Private Limited entered into a contract dated 09.07.2018, where LCPPL was to provide digital marketing and advertising services to Play Games. LCPPL claimed that Play Games defaulted on payments amounting to Rs.6,35,13,977/-. LCPPL sent a notice under Section 8 of the IBC on 5th April 2019. Play Games responded on 15th April 2019, raising disputes about unauthorized use of brand keywords and incorrect geographical locations of leads. Prior to LCPPL's notice, Play Games had sent a legal notice dated 23rd March 2019, alleging unauthorized use of the brand name, overcharging, and collusion with employees. Play Games also relied on an investigation report from Deloitte Touche of March 2019. Play Games
…Sign in to view the parties.
Living Consumer Products Private Limited and…
Play Games 24x7 Private…
Living Consumer Products Private Limited (LCPPL), the Appellant, filed an appeal against the order dated 14th October 2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, which rejected its application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The application was filed against Play Games 24x7 Private Limited, the Respondent and Corporate Debtor, and was rejected on the ground of a pre-existing dispute. The Appellant claimed to have supplied digital marketing and advertising services to the Corporate Debtor as per a contract dated 09.07.2018, with operational dues in default amounting to Rs.6,35,13,977/-. The Corporate Debtor argued that a legal notice dated 23rd March 2019, sent before the demand notice,
…Living Consumer Products Private Limited (LCPPL) and Play Games 24x7 Private Limited entered into a contract dated 09.07.2018, where LCPPL was to provide digital marketing and advertising services to Play Games. LCPPL claimed that Play Games defaulted on payments amounting to Rs.6,35,13,977/-. LCPPL sent a notice under Section 8 of the IBC on 5th April 2019. Play Games responded on 15th April 2019, raising disputes about unauthorized use of brand keywords and incorrect geographical locations of leads. Prior to LCPPL's notice, Play Games had sent a legal notice dated 23rd March 2019, alleging unauthorized use of the brand name, overcharging, and collusion with employees. Play Games also relied on an investigation report from Deloitte Touche of March 2019. Play Games
…Living Consumer Products Private Limited and…
Play Games 24x7 Private…