The appellant, M/s. Kee Projects Ltd., filed an appeal against the judgement dated July 6, 2017, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Principal Bench, New Delhi in CO.PET. No.662/2016. The Adjudicating Authority, through the impugned order, treated a transfer petition of winding-up under Section 439 read with Section 443 read with Section 433(e) read with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, preferred by the respondent, Sharda Rawat, as an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, pursuant to a Central Government Notification dated December 7, 2016, and admitted the application.
M/s. Kee Projects Ltd. (the appellant) appealed against a judgement by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) in CO.PET. No.662/2016. The Adjudicating Authority had treated a winding-up petition filed by Sharda Rawat (the respondent) as an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, and admitted it. The appellant's main grievance was that the order was passed without notice, violating natural justice principles. The appellant claimed settlement with the respondent and partial payment of Rs. 9,21,619/-. The respondent's counsel admitted the lack of notice to the appellant. The Appellate Tribunal noted the absence of appearance on behalf of the 'Corporate Debtor'. The relevance of these facts lies in the procedural fairness required in
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority passed a…
The appellant made a partial payment of Rs.…
The appellant, M/s. Kee Projects Ltd., filed an appeal against the judgement dated July 6, 2017, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Principal Bench, New Delhi in CO.PET. No.662/2016. The Adjudicating Authority, through the impugned order, treated a transfer petition of winding-up under Section 439 read with Section 443 read with Section 433(e) read with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, preferred by the respondent, Sharda Rawat, as an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, pursuant to a Central Government Notification dated December 7, 2016, and admitted the application.
M/s. Kee Projects Ltd. (the appellant) appealed against a judgement by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) in CO.PET. No.662/2016. The Adjudicating Authority had treated a winding-up petition filed by Sharda Rawat (the respondent) as an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, and admitted it. The appellant's main grievance was that the order was passed without notice, violating natural justice principles. The appellant claimed settlement with the respondent and partial payment of Rs. 9,21,619/-. The respondent's counsel admitted the lack of notice to the appellant. The Appellate Tribunal noted the absence of appearance on behalf of the 'Corporate Debtor'. The relevance of these facts lies in the procedural fairness required in
…The Adjudicating Authority passed a…
The appellant made a partial payment of Rs.…