Karpara Project Engineering Private Limited, the Operational Creditor, filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against BGR Energy Systems Ltd., the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Hyderabad Bench, rejected the application, citing the existence of a pre-existing dispute before the issuance of the demand notice. The Appellant, Karpara Project Engineering Private Limited, then filed an appeal against the order dated 13th August, 2018, arguing that the Adjudicating Authority ignored the fact that the Corporate Debtor never raised the issue of delay and liquidated damages during fifteen revisions of the work orders.
Karpara Project Engineering Private Limited (Operational Creditor) was awarded a contract by BGR Energy Systems Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) for the collection of material, loading, transportation, erection, testing, and commissioning of a steam generator. The initial work order was dated 19th August, 2009, with a delivery date of 31st October, 2009. Subsequent work orders and revisions extended the completion time to 31st May, 2015. The Operational Creditor claims to have completed the work on 28th March, 2015, and received a completion certificate. The Operational Creditor raised retention and final bills. The Corporate Debtor sought extensions of bank guarantees provided by the Operational Creditor. The Corporate Debtor sent an email dated 17th July, 2017, admitting dues
…Sign in to view the parties.
Work order dated 19th…
Original deliv…
Karpara Project Engineering Private Limited, the Operational Creditor, filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against BGR Energy Systems Ltd., the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Hyderabad Bench, rejected the application, citing the existence of a pre-existing dispute before the issuance of the demand notice. The Appellant, Karpara Project Engineering Private Limited, then filed an appeal against the order dated 13th August, 2018, arguing that the Adjudicating Authority ignored the fact that the Corporate Debtor never raised the issue of delay and liquidated damages during fifteen revisions of the work orders.
Karpara Project Engineering Private Limited (Operational Creditor) was awarded a contract by BGR Energy Systems Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) for the collection of material, loading, transportation, erection, testing, and commissioning of a steam generator. The initial work order was dated 19th August, 2009, with a delivery date of 31st October, 2009. Subsequent work orders and revisions extended the completion time to 31st May, 2015. The Operational Creditor claims to have completed the work on 28th March, 2015, and received a completion certificate. The Operational Creditor raised retention and final bills. The Corporate Debtor sought extensions of bank guarantees provided by the Operational Creditor. The Corporate Debtor sent an email dated 17th July, 2017, admitting dues
…Work order dated 19th…
Original deliv…