The appeal was filed against the order dated 10th February 2021, passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, approving the Resolution Plan as approved by the Committee of Creditors. The appellant, a shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, challenged the approval of the Resolution Plan Order, alleging non-compliance with Sections 100 to 105 of the Companies Act, 1956, and Section 188, as well as Section 236 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The appellant, K K Sarachandra Bose, a shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, filed an appeal against the order dated 10th February 2021, passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, which approved the Resolution Plan. The appellant challenged the approval of the Resolution Plan Order, alleging non-compliance with Sections 100 to 105 of the Companies Act, 1956, and Section 188, as well as Section 236 of the Companies Act, 2013. The appellant argued that there was an actual reduction in the shares of the appellant and no consent of the shareholder was taken. The respondent contended that no approval of the shareholder is required in law for the approval of the Resolution Plan, referring to Section 30(2) Explanation of the I & B Code,
…Sign in to view the parties.
The National Company Law Tribunal,…
The National Company…
The appeal was filed against the order dated 10th February 2021, passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, approving the Resolution Plan as approved by the Committee of Creditors. The appellant, a shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, challenged the approval of the Resolution Plan Order, alleging non-compliance with Sections 100 to 105 of the Companies Act, 1956, and Section 188, as well as Section 236 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The appellant, K K Sarachandra Bose, a shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, filed an appeal against the order dated 10th February 2021, passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, which approved the Resolution Plan. The appellant challenged the approval of the Resolution Plan Order, alleging non-compliance with Sections 100 to 105 of the Companies Act, 1956, and Section 188, as well as Section 236 of the Companies Act, 2013. The appellant argued that there was an actual reduction in the shares of the appellant and no consent of the shareholder was taken. The respondent contended that no approval of the shareholder is required in law for the approval of the Resolution Plan, referring to Section 30(2) Explanation of the I & B Code,
…The National Company Law Tribunal,…
The National Company…