The case involves an appeal against an order related to the insolvency resolution process of Mittal Corp Ltd. The appellant, Jindal Stainless Ltd., is challenging certain aspects of the resolution process. The respondent No. 2 filed an application before the Adjudicating Authority seeking direction to submit a Revised Resolution Plan, which was allowed by the Impugned Order dated 11th August, 2022.
Jindal Stainless Ltd. is the appellant in a case against Shailendra Ajmera, the Resolution Professional of Mittal Corp Ltd. & Anr. The appeal concerns the insolvency resolution process of Mittal Corp Ltd. The appellant's counsel argued that the challenge mechanism was undertaken and completed on July 18, 2022, and voting commenced on August 5, 2022. Respondent No. 2 filed an application seeking direction to submit a Revised Resolution Plan, which was allowed by an order dated August 11, 2022. The appellant contends that this order is contrary to regulations. The respondents argue that the objective of the insolvency resolution process is maximization and that any enhancement to the Resolution Plan should not be objected to. The court permitted the impleadment of
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Challenge…
Voting commence…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against an order related to the insolvency resolution process of Mittal Corp Ltd. The appellant, Jindal Stainless Ltd., is challenging certain aspects of the resolution process. The respondent No. 2 filed an application before the Adjudicating Authority seeking direction to submit a Revised Resolution Plan, which was allowed by the Impugned Order dated 11th August, 2022.
Jindal Stainless Ltd. is the appellant in a case against Shailendra Ajmera, the Resolution Professional of Mittal Corp Ltd. & Anr. The appeal concerns the insolvency resolution process of Mittal Corp Ltd. The appellant's counsel argued that the challenge mechanism was undertaken and completed on July 18, 2022, and voting commenced on August 5, 2022. Respondent No. 2 filed an application seeking direction to submit a Revised Resolution Plan, which was allowed by an order dated August 11, 2022. The appellant contends that this order is contrary to regulations. The respondents argue that the objective of the insolvency resolution process is maximization and that any enhancement to the Resolution Plan should not be objected to. The court permitted the impleadment of
…The Challenge…
Voting commence…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.