This case involves an appeal against an order delivered by the NCLT, Chandigarh Bench, on 08.12.2023. The appellant, Industrial Forgings Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed the appeal with a delay, prompting an application for condonation of delay. The delay arose because the appellant initially filed an application before the Adjudicating Authority for correction of the order date, which was erroneously recorded as 08.12.2022 on the first page of the order, while the correct date, 08.12.2023, was mentioned at the end. The application for correction was heard and decided on 29.04.2024. The appellant contended that the limitation period for filing the appeal should commence from the corrected date, making the delay only 14 days. The respondent, A2Z Infra Engineering Ltd.,
…The key facts are as follows: An order was delivered by NCLT, Chandigarh on 08.12.2023. The first page of the order incorrectly mentioned the date as 08.12.2022, while the end of the order correctly stated 08.12.2023. The appellant filed an application for correction of the order date, which was allowed on 29.04.2024. The appellant then filed an appeal, claiming the limitation period should commence from the corrected date. The respondent contended that the limitation period should commence from the original order date. The appeal was filed on 12.06.2024, which was beyond the condonable delay period if calculated from the original order date. The appellant argued that the delay was only 14 days if calculated from the date of correction. The delay in filing the appeal
…Sign in to view the parties.
NCLT, Chandigarh Bench, delivered the…
The Appellant filed an application before the…
This case involves an appeal against an order delivered by the NCLT, Chandigarh Bench, on 08.12.2023. The appellant, Industrial Forgings Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed the appeal with a delay, prompting an application for condonation of delay. The delay arose because the appellant initially filed an application before the Adjudicating Authority for correction of the order date, which was erroneously recorded as 08.12.2022 on the first page of the order, while the correct date, 08.12.2023, was mentioned at the end. The application for correction was heard and decided on 29.04.2024. The appellant contended that the limitation period for filing the appeal should commence from the corrected date, making the delay only 14 days. The respondent, A2Z Infra Engineering Ltd.,
…The key facts are as follows: An order was delivered by NCLT, Chandigarh on 08.12.2023. The first page of the order incorrectly mentioned the date as 08.12.2022, while the end of the order correctly stated 08.12.2023. The appellant filed an application for correction of the order date, which was allowed on 29.04.2024. The appellant then filed an appeal, claiming the limitation period should commence from the corrected date. The respondent contended that the limitation period should commence from the original order date. The appeal was filed on 12.06.2024, which was beyond the condonable delay period if calculated from the original order date. The appellant argued that the delay was only 14 days if calculated from the date of correction. The delay in filing the appeal
…NCLT, Chandigarh Bench, delivered the…
The Appellant filed an application before the…