The case involves an appeal preferred by the Appellant, IFCI Ltd., against an order of adjournment. The order notes the presence of counsel representing both sides and the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Time was requested and granted for making submissions. The matter was scheduled to be put up on 22.04.2019.
IFCI Ltd. filed an appeal against an order of adjournment. Counsel for both sides and the Enforcement Directorate were present. The court granted time for submissions. The matter was scheduled for further hearing on 22.04.2019. The court determined that there was no cause of action to prefer the appeal and dismissed it. The court considered imposing costs but did not, at the request of the appellant's counsel.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Appellant, IFCI…
The matter was…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal preferred by the Appellant, IFCI Ltd., against an order of adjournment. The order notes the presence of counsel representing both sides and the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Time was requested and granted for making submissions. The matter was scheduled to be put up on 22.04.2019.
IFCI Ltd. filed an appeal against an order of adjournment. Counsel for both sides and the Enforcement Directorate were present. The court granted time for submissions. The matter was scheduled for further hearing on 22.04.2019. The court determined that there was no cause of action to prefer the appeal and dismissed it. The court considered imposing costs but did not, at the request of the appellant's counsel.
The Appellant, IFCI…
The matter was…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.