The case involves an appeal concerning the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of JaypeeInfratech Ltd., specifically regarding the counting of voting shares of allottees and the exclusion of a certain period from the 270-day resolution process.
The Appellate Tribunal, in its order dated July 12, 2019, in Company Appeal AT (Ins) No. 708 of 2019, noted that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for infrastructure companies might need a different approach. It was observed that in such cases, the primary goal of asset maximization should benefit the allottees and other financial creditors, rather than solely the corporate debtor. The Tribunal emphasized that any resolution plan must be viable and feasible for all stakeholders involved.
…Appellate Tribunal passed an order in Company…
An application was filed before the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal concerning the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of JaypeeInfratech Ltd., specifically regarding the counting of voting shares of allottees and the exclusion of a certain period from the 270-day resolution process.
The Appellate Tribunal, in its order dated July 12, 2019, in Company Appeal AT (Ins) No. 708 of 2019, noted that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for infrastructure companies might need a different approach. It was observed that in such cases, the primary goal of asset maximization should benefit the allottees and other financial creditors, rather than solely the corporate debtor. The Tribunal emphasized that any resolution plan must be viable and feasible for all stakeholders involved.
…Appellate Tribunal passed an order in Company…
An application was filed before the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.