The appeal was filed against the order dated 25.08.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Mumbai Bench-IV, which admitted Section 7 Application filed by the Respondent. The appellant's counsel submitted that an amount of Rs.5 Lakhs, directed by the Adjudicating Authority, was already paid to the IRP. The tribunal noted that an Interim Order was passed on 14.09.2023, less than a month after the impugned order.
Govind Krishnan Muthukumar filed an appeal against ASK Property Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The appeal contested the order dated 25.08.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Mumbai Bench-IV, which admitted Section 7 Application filed by the Respondent. During the proceedings, the Learned Counsel for the Financial Creditor submitted that Consent Terms had already been entered. The appellant's counsel further submitted that an amount of Rs.5 Lakhs, which was directed by the Adjudicating Authority to be paid, was already paid to the IRP. The tribunal noted that an Interim Order was passed on 14.09.2023. The relevance of these facts lies in the tribunal's decision to dispose of the appeal based on the consent terms and the
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
An Interim Or…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The appeal was filed against the order dated 25.08.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Mumbai Bench-IV, which admitted Section 7 Application filed by the Respondent. The appellant's counsel submitted that an amount of Rs.5 Lakhs, directed by the Adjudicating Authority, was already paid to the IRP. The tribunal noted that an Interim Order was passed on 14.09.2023, less than a month after the impugned order.
Govind Krishnan Muthukumar filed an appeal against ASK Property Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The appeal contested the order dated 25.08.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Mumbai Bench-IV, which admitted Section 7 Application filed by the Respondent. During the proceedings, the Learned Counsel for the Financial Creditor submitted that Consent Terms had already been entered. The appellant's counsel further submitted that an amount of Rs.5 Lakhs, which was directed by the Adjudicating Authority to be paid, was already paid to the IRP. The tribunal noted that an Interim Order was passed on 14.09.2023. The relevance of these facts lies in the tribunal's decision to dispose of the appeal based on the consent terms and the
…The Adjudicating Authority (National Company…
An Interim Or…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.