The case involves an appeal against an impugned order directing liquidation of the corporate debtor. The appellant claims to have offered the entire principal amount claimed by the bank. Two financial creditors have expressed their opinion to accept the settlement given by the appellant. The Bank of Baroda sent a mail that steps be taken for CoC's consideration under 12A.
Gokul Aggarwal filed an appeal against an order directing the liquidation of a corporate debtor. Gokul Aggarwal claimed to have offered the entire principal amount claimed by the Bank of India. Two financial creditors have expressed their opinion to accept the settlement given by the Appellant. The Bank of Baroda sent a mail that steps be taken for CoC's consideration under 12A. There was a delay of 12 days in filing the appeal, attributed to the appellant's health ailments and difficulty in seeking timely legal advice. There was also a delay of 34 days in re-filing the appeal due to defects pointed out, and the appellant's authorized signatory residing outside Delhi. The appellant is required to provide the email address and mobile number of the respondents to the
…Sign in to view the parties.
Order was passed condoning the delay in filing…
The appeal is listed…
The case involves an appeal against an impugned order directing liquidation of the corporate debtor. The appellant claims to have offered the entire principal amount claimed by the bank. Two financial creditors have expressed their opinion to accept the settlement given by the appellant. The Bank of Baroda sent a mail that steps be taken for CoC's consideration under 12A.
Gokul Aggarwal filed an appeal against an order directing the liquidation of a corporate debtor. Gokul Aggarwal claimed to have offered the entire principal amount claimed by the Bank of India. Two financial creditors have expressed their opinion to accept the settlement given by the Appellant. The Bank of Baroda sent a mail that steps be taken for CoC's consideration under 12A. There was a delay of 12 days in filing the appeal, attributed to the appellant's health ailments and difficulty in seeking timely legal advice. There was also a delay of 34 days in re-filing the appeal due to defects pointed out, and the appellant's authorized signatory residing outside Delhi. The appellant is required to provide the email address and mobile number of the respondents to the
…Order was passed condoning the delay in filing…
The appeal is listed…