The case involves two appeals filed against an order dated 2024-05-02 by the Adjudicating Authority, which rejected the Resolution Professional's application for approving a resolution plan on the grounds that the SRA (Specific Relief Act) is not eligible. The SRA had filed an application to be impleaded in the application filed by the Financial Creditor, questioning the SRA's eligibility. The SRA argued that it was the best entity to explain its eligibility but was kept out of the proceedings. The Resolution Professional also argued that the Adjudicating Authority erred in holding the SRA ineligible. The Financial Creditor argued that there was ample material on record to indicate that the SRA was not eligible, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly passed the
…The Resolution Professional filed an application for approving a resolution plan. The Adjudicating Authority rejected the application, deeming the SRA ineligible. The SRA filed an application to be impleaded in the proceedings initiated by the Financial Creditor, challenging the SRA's eligibility. The SRA claims it was wrongly excluded from the proceedings and could best explain its eligibility. The Financial Creditor argues sufficient evidence exists to prove the SRA's ineligibility. The CoC supports the view that the SRA's eligibility was examined and found wanting. The Adjudicating Authority's order is being appealed. The court granted an interim order, rejecting the prayer submitted by the Financial Creditor.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order…
Two appeals were filed against the order…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves two appeals filed against an order dated 2024-05-02 by the Adjudicating Authority, which rejected the Resolution Professional's application for approving a resolution plan on the grounds that the SRA (Specific Relief Act) is not eligible. The SRA had filed an application to be impleaded in the application filed by the Financial Creditor, questioning the SRA's eligibility. The SRA argued that it was the best entity to explain its eligibility but was kept out of the proceedings. The Resolution Professional also argued that the Adjudicating Authority erred in holding the SRA ineligible. The Financial Creditor argued that there was ample material on record to indicate that the SRA was not eligible, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly passed the
…The Resolution Professional filed an application for approving a resolution plan. The Adjudicating Authority rejected the application, deeming the SRA ineligible. The SRA filed an application to be impleaded in the proceedings initiated by the Financial Creditor, challenging the SRA's eligibility. The SRA claims it was wrongly excluded from the proceedings and could best explain its eligibility. The Financial Creditor argues sufficient evidence exists to prove the SRA's ineligibility. The CoC supports the view that the SRA's eligibility was examined and found wanting. The Adjudicating Authority's order is being appealed. The court granted an interim order, rejecting the prayer submitted by the Financial Creditor.
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order…
Two appeals were filed against the order…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.