The case involves an appeal regarding whether an amount advanced for the procurement of 'Low Carbon Ferro Chrome' constitutes a 'Financial Debt' under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant contends that the amount was disbursed towards the purchase of goods, while the respondent argues that it represents a loan with a 2% monthly interest rate, thus falling under the definition of 'financial debt'.
Gaurav Agrawal, Director of M/s Albus India Ltd., filed an appeal against M/s. TUF Metallurgical Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. The dispute concerns an agreement dated April 4, 2017, where the respondent had the right to procure 'Low Carbon Ferro Chrome' from the 'Corporate Debtor'. The appellant argues that the amount advanced for this procurement does not constitute a 'Financial Debt' under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, because it was disbursed for the purchase of goods. The respondent contends that the amount was disbursed as a loan with a 2% monthly interest rate, thus qualifying as a 'financial debt' and giving them a first charge over the 'Low Carbon Ferro Chrome'. The relevance of these facts lies in determining whether the respondent can be
…Sign in to view the parties.
Agreement dated 4th April, 2017, Respondent had…
Hearing o…
The case involves an appeal regarding whether an amount advanced for the procurement of 'Low Carbon Ferro Chrome' constitutes a 'Financial Debt' under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant contends that the amount was disbursed towards the purchase of goods, while the respondent argues that it represents a loan with a 2% monthly interest rate, thus falling under the definition of 'financial debt'.
Gaurav Agrawal, Director of M/s Albus India Ltd., filed an appeal against M/s. TUF Metallurgical Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. The dispute concerns an agreement dated April 4, 2017, where the respondent had the right to procure 'Low Carbon Ferro Chrome' from the 'Corporate Debtor'. The appellant argues that the amount advanced for this procurement does not constitute a 'Financial Debt' under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, because it was disbursed for the purchase of goods. The respondent contends that the amount was disbursed as a loan with a 2% monthly interest rate, thus qualifying as a 'financial debt' and giving them a first charge over the 'Low Carbon Ferro Chrome'. The relevance of these facts lies in determining whether the respondent can be
…Agreement dated 4th April, 2017, Respondent had…
Hearing o…