The document presents two separate cases before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The first case, Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No. 294 of 2018, involves Gail (India) Ltd. as the appellant and M/s. Neycer India Ltd. as the respondent. It concerns a petition filed by Neycer India Ltd. before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), which was later abolished. The second case, Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No. 329 of 2018, involves an internal dispute between State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank regarding the sale proceeds of assets of a corporate debtor. The third case, Company Appeal (AT) No. 29 of 2019, involves Hari Sankaran as the appellant and the Union of India as the respondent, concerning the recasting of
…Case 1 (Gail vs. Neycer): M/s. Neycer India Ltd. filed a petition before the BIFR, which sanctioned a revival scheme. After the repeal of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, Gail (India) Ltd. filed a writ petition against the scheme. The BIFR was abolished, and the Central Government issued a notification under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Gail argued before the Adjudicating Authority that the application was not maintainable, but the Adjudicating Authority rejected this argument. Case 2 (SBI vs. PNB): State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank have an internal dispute regarding Rs. 300 crores collected from the sale of assets of a corporate debtor before the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Punjab National Bank claims that State Bank
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Respondent- ‘M/s. Neycer India Ltd.' filed…
The application was not maintainable, which…
The document presents two separate cases before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The first case, Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No. 294 of 2018, involves Gail (India) Ltd. as the appellant and M/s. Neycer India Ltd. as the respondent. It concerns a petition filed by Neycer India Ltd. before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), which was later abolished. The second case, Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No. 329 of 2018, involves an internal dispute between State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank regarding the sale proceeds of assets of a corporate debtor. The third case, Company Appeal (AT) No. 29 of 2019, involves Hari Sankaran as the appellant and the Union of India as the respondent, concerning the recasting of
…Case 1 (Gail vs. Neycer): M/s. Neycer India Ltd. filed a petition before the BIFR, which sanctioned a revival scheme. After the repeal of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, Gail (India) Ltd. filed a writ petition against the scheme. The BIFR was abolished, and the Central Government issued a notification under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Gail argued before the Adjudicating Authority that the application was not maintainable, but the Adjudicating Authority rejected this argument. Case 2 (SBI vs. PNB): State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank have an internal dispute regarding Rs. 300 crores collected from the sale of assets of a corporate debtor before the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Punjab National Bank claims that State Bank
…The Respondent- ‘M/s. Neycer India Ltd.' filed…
The application was not maintainable, which…