The case involves an appeal against an order dated 24.01.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, in Company Petition (CP) (IB) No. 80/MB/2020. The appellant, Evergreen Corporation, filed Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2349 of 2024, seeking condonation of a 244-day delay in filing the appeal. The appellant cited health issues and the advocate's unfamiliarity with NCLAT procedures as reasons for the delay. The respondent, M/ss. Satec Envir Engineering (India) Pvt. Ltd., opposed the condonation of delay.
Evergreen Corporation filed an appeal against an order by NCLT Mumbai in CP (IB) No. 80/MB/2020. The appeal, Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2349 of 2024, was filed with a delay of 244 days, for which the appellant sought condonation. The appellant cited health issues and the advocate's unfamiliarity with NCLAT procedures as reasons for the delay. The registry repeatedly raised defects in the filing, which were not cured promptly. The initial appeal was filed on 22.02.2024, within the 30-day limitation period from the impugned order dated 24.01.2024. However, defects were notified, and the re-filing was delayed. The appellant claimed to be 77 years old and hospitalized during part of the delay period. The respondent opposed the condonation, arguing the delay was
…Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed by the…
Company Appeal (AT)…
The case involves an appeal against an order dated 24.01.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, in Company Petition (CP) (IB) No. 80/MB/2020. The appellant, Evergreen Corporation, filed Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2349 of 2024, seeking condonation of a 244-day delay in filing the appeal. The appellant cited health issues and the advocate's unfamiliarity with NCLAT procedures as reasons for the delay. The respondent, M/ss. Satec Envir Engineering (India) Pvt. Ltd., opposed the condonation of delay.
Evergreen Corporation filed an appeal against an order by NCLT Mumbai in CP (IB) No. 80/MB/2020. The appeal, Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2349 of 2024, was filed with a delay of 244 days, for which the appellant sought condonation. The appellant cited health issues and the advocate's unfamiliarity with NCLAT procedures as reasons for the delay. The registry repeatedly raised defects in the filing, which were not cured promptly. The initial appeal was filed on 22.02.2024, within the 30-day limitation period from the impugned order dated 24.01.2024. However, defects were notified, and the re-filing was delayed. The appellant claimed to be 77 years old and hospitalized during part of the delay period. The respondent opposed the condonation, arguing the delay was
…Order passed by the…
Company Appeal (AT)…