The case involves an appeal against an order of withdrawal of a company petition. The appellant claims that the Adjudicating Authority passed the impugned order of withdrawal due to fraud, falling under Section 12(4) of the I&B Code. The appellant argues that the appeal is not maintainable.
Euro Pratik Ispat (India) Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal against an order of withdrawal of a company petition. The appellant contended that the Adjudicating Authority's order was influenced by fraud, specifically referencing Section 12(4) of the I&B Code. The appellant's advocate argued that the appeal against the withdrawal order is not maintainable. The core issue revolves around the alleged fraud and the appropriate forum for addressing it.
Sign in to view the parties.
Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate representing the…
The case involves an appeal against an order of withdrawal of a company petition. The appellant claims that the Adjudicating Authority passed the impugned order of withdrawal due to fraud, falling under Section 12(4) of the I&B Code. The appellant argues that the appeal is not maintainable.
Euro Pratik Ispat (India) Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal against an order of withdrawal of a company petition. The appellant contended that the Adjudicating Authority's order was influenced by fraud, specifically referencing Section 12(4) of the I&B Code. The appellant's advocate argued that the appeal against the withdrawal order is not maintainable. The core issue revolves around the alleged fraud and the appropriate forum for addressing it.
Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate representing the…