The Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) filed an appeal against an order dated 13.08.2025 passed by the adjudicating authority in I.A. (IBC) 3126/MB/2025. The EPFO sought directions to the IRP to consider their claim for Rs. 6,08,927/- as statutory PF dues with priority over other debts.
The Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) filed an appeal against an order passed by the adjudicating authority.
The EPFO sought directions to the IRP to consider their claim for statutory PF dues.
The adjudicating authority dismissed the EPFO's application.
The NCLAT granted the appellant 15 days to file its claim in the prescribed form.
The IRP was directed to verify the claim on its merits.
The NCLAT clarified that it had not examined whether the Applicant could have passed any order u/s 7A, 7Q and 14B of PF Act after commencement of CIRP.
The resolution plan had already been approved on 30.01.2026.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed by the adjudicating authority in…
The resolution…
The Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) filed an appeal against an order dated 13.08.2025 passed by the adjudicating authority in I.A. (IBC) 3126/MB/2025. The EPFO sought directions to the IRP to consider their claim for Rs. 6,08,927/- as statutory PF dues with priority over other debts.
The Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) filed an appeal against an order passed by the adjudicating authority.
The EPFO sought directions to the IRP to consider their claim for statutory PF dues.
The adjudicating authority dismissed the EPFO's application.
The NCLAT granted the appellant 15 days to file its claim in the prescribed form.
The IRP was directed to verify the claim on its merits.
The NCLAT clarified that it had not examined whether the Applicant could have passed any order u/s 7A, 7Q and 14B of PF Act after commencement of CIRP.
The resolution plan had already been approved on 30.01.2026.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal.
Order passed by the adjudicating authority in…
The resolution…