The case involves multiple Company Appeals (AT) (Insolvency) numbered 358, 359, 495, and 496 of 2018. The appeals relate to a Resolution Plan submitted by a Resolution Applicant, which was initially approved in principle but later rejected by the Committee of Creditors. The court seeks clarification from the Appellant regarding any intention to modify the Resolution Plan, particularly concerning the financial matrix for asset maximization and creditor balancing.
Eight Finance Pvt. Ltd. is the Appellant in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 358 and 359 of 2018, while Amit Gupta, R.P. is the Respondent. In Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 495 and 496 of 2018, S. C. Sekaran is the Appellant, and Amit Gupta & Ors. are the Respondents. The core issue involves a Resolution Plan that was initially approved in principle but later rejected by the Committee of Creditors. The court is seeking clarification from the Appellant regarding potential modifications to the financial matrix within the Resolution Plan, aiming to maximize the Corporate Debtor's assets and balance the interests of Financial Creditors and Operational Creditors. An interim order mandates the Liquidator to ensure payment of dues to working employees, if
…Sign in to view the parties.
Interim order issued, directing the…
Court discussed the Resolution Plan and sought…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves multiple Company Appeals (AT) (Insolvency) numbered 358, 359, 495, and 496 of 2018. The appeals relate to a Resolution Plan submitted by a Resolution Applicant, which was initially approved in principle but later rejected by the Committee of Creditors. The court seeks clarification from the Appellant regarding any intention to modify the Resolution Plan, particularly concerning the financial matrix for asset maximization and creditor balancing.
Eight Finance Pvt. Ltd. is the Appellant in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 358 and 359 of 2018, while Amit Gupta, R.P. is the Respondent. In Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 495 and 496 of 2018, S. C. Sekaran is the Appellant, and Amit Gupta & Ors. are the Respondents. The core issue involves a Resolution Plan that was initially approved in principle but later rejected by the Committee of Creditors. The court is seeking clarification from the Appellant regarding potential modifications to the financial matrix within the Resolution Plan, aiming to maximize the Corporate Debtor's assets and balance the interests of Financial Creditors and Operational Creditors. An interim order mandates the Liquidator to ensure payment of dues to working employees, if
…Interim order issued, directing the…
Court discussed the Resolution Plan and sought…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.