The Directorate of Enforcement filed an appeal against the Committee of Creditors & Ors. The appeal was filed with a delay of 789 days. The order being appealed was passed by the Adjudicating Authority on 14.12.2020. The appellant claims they only learned of the related party at the end of March 2023, prompting the appeal. The appellant argued that the limitation period for filing the appeal should only begin when the appellant became aware of the related party, citing Section 17 of the Limitation Act. The respondent refuted this, arguing that the limitation period starts from the date the order was pronounced. The respondent cited a Supreme Court judgment in V.Nagarajan Vs. SKS Ispat & Power Ltd. & Ors. (2022) 2 SCC 244. The tribunal noted that similar

The Directorate of Enforcement filed an appeal against the Committee of Creditors & Ors. The appeal was filed with a delay of 789 days. The order being appealed was passed by the Adjudicating Authority on 14.12.2020. The appellant claims they only learned of the related party at the end of March 2023, prompting the appeal. The appellant argued that the limitation period for filing the appeal should only begin when the appellant became aware of the related party, citing Section 17 of the Limitation Act. The respondent refuted this, arguing that the limitation period starts from the date the order was pronounced. The respondent cited a Supreme Court judgment in V.Nagarajan Vs. SKS Ispat & Power Ltd. & Ors. (2022) 2 SCC 244. The tribunal noted that similar