The Deputy Commissioner, CGST Kalol, Gujrat, filed an appeal against the approval of a Resolution Plan for M/s Gopala Polyplast Ltd. The appellant claimed outstanding GST dues of Rs.2,36,67,282/- from the Corporate Debtor, but the Resolution Plan only provided Rs.1,18,336/- for settlement. The appellant argued that this amount was insufficient. The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench, had approved the Resolution Plan. The appellant argued that the approved amount was insufficient considering the outstanding claim. The key fact is the discrepancy between the claimed amount and the amount provided in the resolution plan, which forms the basis of the appeal.

The Deputy Commissioner, CGST Kalol, Gujrat, filed an appeal against the approval of a Resolution Plan for M/s Gopala Polyplast Ltd. The appellant claimed outstanding GST dues of Rs.2,36,67,282/- from the Corporate Debtor, but the Resolution Plan only provided Rs.1,18,336/- for settlement. The appellant argued that this amount was insufficient. The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench, had approved the Resolution Plan. The appellant argued that the approved amount was insufficient considering the outstanding claim. The key fact is the discrepancy between the claimed amount and the amount provided in the resolution plan, which forms the basis of the appeal.