The case involves two appeals filed by the liquidator of Adi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, regarding two applications filed by the liquidator. These applications were related to seeking dissolution of the Corporate Debtor (CD) and recalling a previous order that granted reliefs and concessions to the successful auction purchaser. The liquidator initiated liquidation proceedings and issued an e-auction sale notice for the assets of Adi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Respondent No. 1 emerged as the successful auction purchaser. After the respondent paid the auction money, the liquidator issued an agreement and a possession letter. Subsequently, the respondent filed an application for reliefs and concessions, which was
…Adi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. underwent liquidation, and its liquidator initiated an e-auction for the sale of assets. The sale notice included terms like 'As is Where is Basis,' 'As is What is Basis,' 'Whatever there is Basis,' and 'No Recourse Basis.' Respondent No. 1 emerged as the successful auction purchaser and paid the auction money. The liquidator issued an agreement and possession letter after receiving full consideration. The respondent then filed an application seeking reliefs and concessions, which was initially allowed. Subsequently, the liquidator filed an application for the dissolution of the Corporate Debtor (CD), which was initially allowed but later set aside by the Tribunal. The liquidator filed two applications: one for dissolution under Section 54 of the
…Sign in to view the parties.
Liquidator issued an…
Application for…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves two appeals filed by the liquidator of Adi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, regarding two applications filed by the liquidator. These applications were related to seeking dissolution of the Corporate Debtor (CD) and recalling a previous order that granted reliefs and concessions to the successful auction purchaser. The liquidator initiated liquidation proceedings and issued an e-auction sale notice for the assets of Adi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Respondent No. 1 emerged as the successful auction purchaser. After the respondent paid the auction money, the liquidator issued an agreement and a possession letter. Subsequently, the respondent filed an application for reliefs and concessions, which was
…Adi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. underwent liquidation, and its liquidator initiated an e-auction for the sale of assets. The sale notice included terms like 'As is Where is Basis,' 'As is What is Basis,' 'Whatever there is Basis,' and 'No Recourse Basis.' Respondent No. 1 emerged as the successful auction purchaser and paid the auction money. The liquidator issued an agreement and possession letter after receiving full consideration. The respondent then filed an application seeking reliefs and concessions, which was initially allowed. Subsequently, the liquidator filed an application for the dissolution of the Corporate Debtor (CD), which was initially allowed but later set aside by the Tribunal. The liquidator filed two applications: one for dissolution under Section 54 of the
…Liquidator issued an…
Application for…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.