The Appellant, claiming to be a Shareholder/Promoter/Suspended Director of M/s. Cesan Glass Pvt. Ltd. (the Corporate Debtor), challenged an Impugned Order dated 2024-04-25 rendered by NCLT, Hyderabad, in IA(IBC) No.20/2023 in TCP(IB) No.73/9/HDB/2019. The Impugned Order rejected IA(IBC) 20/2023. The Appellant, though not a party to the Company Petition proceedings, filed an IA before the NCLT, citing his participation in CoC meetings and the inclusion of his private properties in the Resolution Plan, seeking specific reliefs.
The Appellant, Ch.V.N. Raghurama Gupta, claims to be a Shareholder/Promoter/Suspended Director of Cesan Glass Pvt. Ltd., the Corporate Debtor. He challenged an order dated 2024-04-25 passed by NCLT, Hyderabad, which rejected IA(IBC) 20/2023. The Appellant, though not a party to the original Company Petition, filed an IA seeking certain reliefs, citing his participation in CoC meetings and the inclusion of his private properties in the Resolution Plan. The NCLT rejected his application and imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000. The Appellant then sought to withdraw his appeal before the NCLAT, reserving the right to pursue other remedies.
Sign in to view the parties.
NCLT, Hyderabad, rendered the Impugned…
The 13th meeting of the CoC was held, where…
The Appellant, claiming to be a Shareholder/Promoter/Suspended Director of M/s. Cesan Glass Pvt. Ltd. (the Corporate Debtor), challenged an Impugned Order dated 2024-04-25 rendered by NCLT, Hyderabad, in IA(IBC) No.20/2023 in TCP(IB) No.73/9/HDB/2019. The Impugned Order rejected IA(IBC) 20/2023. The Appellant, though not a party to the Company Petition proceedings, filed an IA before the NCLT, citing his participation in CoC meetings and the inclusion of his private properties in the Resolution Plan, seeking specific reliefs.
The Appellant, Ch.V.N. Raghurama Gupta, claims to be a Shareholder/Promoter/Suspended Director of Cesan Glass Pvt. Ltd., the Corporate Debtor. He challenged an order dated 2024-04-25 passed by NCLT, Hyderabad, which rejected IA(IBC) 20/2023. The Appellant, though not a party to the original Company Petition, filed an IA seeking certain reliefs, citing his participation in CoC meetings and the inclusion of his private properties in the Resolution Plan. The NCLT rejected his application and imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000. The Appellant then sought to withdraw his appeal before the NCLAT, reserving the right to pursue other remedies.
NCLT, Hyderabad, rendered the Impugned…
The 13th meeting of the CoC was held, where…